Skip to main content

Introduction

When you read the title of my blog, you conclude that language does influence the way we think. But it was not (and is still not) obvious for everyone. Some people believe that language is a reaction to the world around us; that our sourroundings shape the way we express. There is this well-know example of Eskimos who have invented different words to describe different types of snow. Why have they done it? Because they needed. Because, for somebody who lives in an igloo, it is crucial to make this disctincion. Does it mean that the topic of my blog doesn't make any sense? Not really.

I would like to start with bringing you closer a very intereting linguistic hypothesis that encouraged me to start tinking about language as something more that an instrument of communication - sending our thoughts to others. According to Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, language influences the way we see the world far more than we think. There are two versions of this idea:
The strong version which says that the language determines the way we think
and the weak version which says that it only influeces our thoughts.
It is extremely difficult to verify if the first assumption is right but, on the other hand, we can read about various experiments that show differences in time, space or colour perception between people who use languages with dissimilar structures. These are the topics that I'm going to write about in next posts.

In conclusion, there are many, sometimes extremely opposite, ideas and theories that try to answer these (and many other) questions: Are our thoughts determined by the language we learned? Or is the language only "a reply" to our need of comunication? Obviously, I'm not able (and I doubt if I would ever be able) to tell you simply "yes" or "not". I would only like to introduce you some interesting general issues connected with this subject. Enjoy!

Comments

  1. Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis was the first thing I really loved about linguistics. It makes so much sense! It accounts for differences between individuals and between ethnic groups; it is relevant to foreign language learning, too. I am really looking forward to reading your blog :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for this comment! I hope you'll like my next posts too. Btw, have you seen the film "New Arrival" with Amy Adams in the leading role (available on Netflix)? That will be a perfect choice for a person interested in linguistics!

      Delete
    2. EDIT: This film is unfortunately not available anymore on Netflix. :(

      Delete
    3. But of course I know "Arrival", and I love it! The movie - and Amy Adams - should have won all awards on earth! :) I guess prejudice against science fiction is partly responsible. Such "genre movies" are just not taken seriously enough.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Changes

In the last post, I told you that I'm sure that "The way that we use our language may help us to fight against discrimination and help to reach gender equality in the real world". I think that it will be interesting to develop a little bit this idea. If changes in the vocabulary of a language may be an element of the fight aginst negative phenomena, we can pose such a question: If we deleted all the words that express hate, would we get rid of it? Imagine that you open a dictionary and you can't see the following words: "hate", "to affront", "discrimination" and so on... if you can't find them, you can't use them, right? Sometimes we think about dictionary as a place where we can find all the words that exist in a language and that can be used be its spakers. But we need to remember that a dictionary is a result of linguits' work. They observe how speakers use the language and note it. So, if we "threw the bad words&

Space perception

Imagine that you're spending a lovely afternoon with your friend in his home and you're starting to have a headache. You want to buy some drugs so you ask him where is the closest pharmacy. The friend tells you: "The pharmacy is north from you". Is it helpful? It is believed that human beings are not good in distinguishing the world directions without using some divices. Most of languages have an egocentric coordination system that refers to the human body (your "right side" might be someone else's "left side"; it depends on your positions). But there are some languages, for example Tseltal Mayan (spoken in one region of Mexico), where the world directions might be taken as reference. Across languages, there are also differences in describing relations between objects. It can be observed by comparing different preposition systems: English (as French and Polish) makes a distinction between the prepositions on and above . In the first case,