Skip to main content

Translation: possible or impossible?

I would like to start with a question: When did people start to translate? We know that the first form of language was the spoken form, so maybe it's better to ask: When did people start to interpret? The answer is simple: they started doing it when two societies that were using different languages met for the first time. A long time ago.

Even though people have been interpreting for thousands of years, linguists ask all the time what translation actually is. So many questions without simple answers:
Is the translated text all the time the same text as before translation?
What is the position of translator?
How much can translator change in a text?
And many others.

One of  the problems here is that tranforming text into another language is extremely difficult because of the differences between languages.

Differences between languages might be less or more visible. When you compare Italian to Spanish, you may notice different pronounciation or idioms but it is nothing when comparing to differences between Spanish and... Japanese, for example. If you want to translate a text, you'll need to use different vocabulary, different grammatical structures. And it's not the biggest problem.

Language is always immersed in a certain context. And this is the most tricky area: translator needs to know to what extent he or she can infuence the text so that it stayed clear to the lecturer but also was the closest to the original. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Changes

In the last post, I told you that I'm sure that "The way that we use our language may help us to fight against discrimination and help to reach gender equality in the real world". I think that it will be interesting to develop a little bit this idea. If changes in the vocabulary of a language may be an element of the fight aginst negative phenomena, we can pose such a question: If we deleted all the words that express hate, would we get rid of it? Imagine that you open a dictionary and you can't see the following words: "hate", "to affront", "discrimination" and so on... if you can't find them, you can't use them, right? Sometimes we think about dictionary as a place where we can find all the words that exist in a language and that can be used be its spakers. But we need to remember that a dictionary is a result of linguits' work. They observe how speakers use the language and note it. So, if we "threw the bad words...
1 comment
Read more

Space perception

Imagine that you're spending a lovely afternoon with your friend in his home and you're starting to have a headache. You want to buy some drugs so you ask him where is the closest pharmacy. The friend tells you: "The pharmacy is north from you". Is it helpful? It is believed that human beings are not good in distinguishing the world directions without using some divices. Most of languages have an egocentric coordination system that refers to the human body (your "right side" might be someone else's "left side"; it depends on your positions). But there are some languages, for example Tseltal Mayan (spoken in one region of Mexico), where the world directions might be taken as reference. Across languages, there are also differences in describing relations between objects. It can be observed by comparing different preposition systems: English (as French and Polish) makes a distinction between the prepositions on and above . In the first case,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Witness and crime

Imagine a young man who broke a vase. Imagine a vase that was broken.  The same situation could be described by using different structures. In the first sentence we see the phrase that says: "A young man broke a vase". It's the easiest and the most likely to be said description. Subject, verb, object. In the second example, we have a passive voice that was applied. If you read my posts regularly, you know that I haven't underlined this difference with no purpose. As I wrote before, we can talk about a situation in different ways. And yes, it has consequences to how we perceive it.  If an English speaker saw a young man breaking a vase in a museum, he would probably use the first construction. On the other hand, Spanish or French speaker would be more likely to say that the vase was broken .  Pay attention that the English speaker is more concentrated on the subject - here: a young man. The second speaker is focused on the action (because of c...
Post a Comment
Read more